Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Leadership Skills

Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum

What is Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum?

The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum is a model of leadership that describes the relationship between a leader’s level of control and a follower’s level of autonomy. The model proposes that a leader can choose to delegate more decision-making authority to followers, or retain more control over decision-making.

The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum was proposed by Robert Tannenbaum and Warren H. Schmidt in their 1973 article “How to Choose a Leadership Pattern.” They developed the model while working at the Institute for Behavioral Research at the University of California, San Diego.

They proposed that leaders should be able to shift their leadership style depending on the situation, and the level of maturity of the group or team. They stated that in the beginning when a group or team is in the early stages of development, the leader should take on a more autocratic style of leadership, providing clear direction and making most of the decisions. As the group or team develops, the leader should gradually shift to a more delegative style, giving the group or team more autonomy and decision-making power.

Autonomy and Control

Autonomy refers to the degree of freedom and independence that a person or group has in making decisions and taking actions. It is the level of self-government or self-rule that an individual or group has in a particular situation.

Advertisement

For example, if a worker is given the freedom to work on a project at their own pace, with minimal supervision, they have a high degree of autonomy.

Control, on the other hand, refers to the degree of oversight and management exercised by a leader or organization over a person or group. It is the extent to which a leader or organization is able to direct and regulate the actions of individuals or groups.

For example, if a manager closely monitors the progress of a project, sets strict deadlines, and makes all final decisions, they are exerting a high degree of control.

In the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum, the model proposes that a leader can choose to delegate more decision-making authority to followers, or retain more control over decision-making. The leadership styles vary on a continuum from autocratic (high control, low autonomy) to delegative (low control, high autonomy) leadership styles.

3 types of leader continuum

The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum proposes three main types of leader continuum: autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire.

  1. Autocratic leadership is characterized by a high level of control and a low level of autonomy for followers. The leader makes all the decisions and provides clear direction, but does not involve followers in the decision-making process.
  2. Democratic leadership is characterized by a balance of control and autonomy. The leader shares decision-making power with followers, and encourages participation and input.
  3. Laissez-faire leadership is characterized by a low level of control and a high level of autonomy for followers. The leader provides little direction and minimal involvement in decision-making, allowing the group or team to make decisions on their own.

7 Types of Leadership Styles in Tannenbaum & Schmidt’s management Continuum

In Tannenbaum and Schmidt’s Leadership Continuum model, there are seven options of leadership styles that a leader can choose from, each corresponding to a different level of control and autonomy.

The seven options are:

  1. Autocratic I: Leader makes all the decisions and gives little opportunity for followers to contribute.
  2. Autocratic II: Leader makes most of the decisions but will seek the advice of followers before making a final decision.
  3. Consultative: Leader seeks the advice and opinions of followers but makes the final decision.
  4. Participative: Leader invites followers to participate in the decision making but retains the final decision.
  5. Delegative: Leader allows followers to make decisions but will still be responsible for the outcomes.
  6. laissez-faire I: Leader allows followers to make decisions and take actions without interference.
  7. laissez-faire II: Leader abdicates responsibility for decision making and actions to followers.

It’s important to note that the leadership styles are not mutually exclusive and a leader may use different styles at different time depending on the situation, and the level of maturity of the group or team.

Advertisement

Advantages and Disadvantages

Each leadership style on the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum has its own advantages and disadvantages.

  1. Autocratic I: Advantages include clear direction, quick decision-making, and the ability to maintain control in an emergency situation. Disadvantages include lack of input from followers, low morale, and lack of motivation.
  2. Autocratic II: Advantages include clear direction and the ability to maintain control in an emergency situation. Disadvantages include lack of input from followers and lack of motivation.
  3. Consultative: Advantages include increased buy-in from followers, improved decision-making, and increased motivation. Disadvantages include slower decision-making, and the possibility that followers may not accept the final decision.
  4. Participative: Advantages include increased buy-in from followers, improved decision-making, and increased motivation. Disadvantages include slower decision-making, and the possibility that followers may not accept the final decision.
  5. Delegative: Advantages include increased autonomy for followers, increased motivation, and improved decision-making. Disadvantages include the possibility that followers may not accept the final decision and lack of control in an emergency situation.
  6. Laissez-faire I: Advantages include increased autonomy for followers, increased motivation, and improved decision-making. Disadvantages include lack of control in an emergency situation, and the possibility that followers may not accept the final decision.
  7. Laissez-faire II: Advantages include increased autonomy for followers, increased motivation, and improved decision-making. Disadvantages include lack of control in an emergency situation, lack of direction, and the possibility that followers may not accept the final decision.

In conclusion, the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum is a model that describes the relationship between a leader’s level of control and a follower’s level of autonomy.

The model suggests that a leader’s decision-making style should match the level of development of the group or team they are leading.

The model proposed 7 leadership styles, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.

The leadership style that works best for a particular situation will depend on factors such as the size and maturity of the group or team, and the nature of the task at hand.

It’s important for the leader to be able to adapt and choose the appropriate style depending on the situation.

Advertisement

Must Visit: Leadership Skills

Advertisement

Marty Hoffman

Marty Hoffman, MBA, PhD Management Consultant for Fortune 500 and Corporate Strategist 📍 San Francisco, CA More »

Related Articles

Back to top button